Friday, June 30, 2006

Star Magazine's Backhanded Apology to Reese

A couple of weeks ago, Star Magazine published a cover story claiming Reese Witherspoon may be expecting. Reese fired back by filing suit against the publication. The latest update is the following correction that was published in this weeks Star:



Source: Popbytes

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:55 AM

    Oh, man! That's harsh! And so rude! And if I weren't such a gossip-addict, I would totally boycott Star!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:56 AM

    And it's not pouch - it's pooch! Duh!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous11:12 AM

    Do you remember those magazine pics a few years ago of Jamie Lee Curtis showing what she looks like in real life and what she looks like when her stylist is done with her? We're so used to celebs who are "made up" that we forget that it's all illusion. It's corsets and body slimmers hiding their pooch tummies.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Of course, now I had to go find the article....

    you can see Jamie Lee Curtis' "regular" and "hollywood" photos at:

    http://www.more.com/more/story.jsp?storyid=/templatedata/lhj/story/data/jamieleecurtistruethighs_08212002.xml

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:46 PM

    I think Reese is adorable, pooch or not. And I love that with all the money, fame and family, she is REAL. This makes me like her even more!

    ReplyDelete